Recently we heard how a combination of a woman’s suspicions, a background check and a mother’s instincts resulted in the apprehension of Phillip Garrido from Antioch, California .
Phillip Garrido with his two daughters in tow approached Liza Campbell, Events Organiser, University of California, Berkeley, about holding an event at the University. Liza Campbell became suspicious and carried out a Background Check on him. His record showed him to be on parole for a rape conviction and to be a registered sex offender.
After asking Phillip Garrido and his two daughters to return the next day for a further meeting Liza contacted Police Officer, Ally Jacobs, and asked Ally to sit in with her and Garrido at this following meeting.
Ally’s motherly feelings told her something just wasn’t right about the two teenage girls and told Garrido’sparole officer .
Back came the shocking news. She felt sick to her stomach. Garrido didn’t have any daughters!
Now Phillip and Nancy Garrido face a combined total of 29 felony charges, involving forcible abduction, rape and false imprisonment in connection with the kidnapping of Jaycee Lee Dugard in 1991.
At the El Dorado County Superior Court in Placerville, California, Superior Court Judge Douglas Phimister set bail for Phillip Garrido at 30 million dollars while he awaits trial.
This is what a woman’s suspicion, a Background Check and a mother’s instincts can do. Hooray for background checks and suspicion. How great was that result!
Now we read of one more great success story of a Background Check bringing someone to justice but this one doesn’t have the ingredients of a woman’s suspicions or a mother’s instincts. This crazy story is so incredulous you just can’t make it up .
Johnny Wright was detained last week after trying to apply for a driving job in an Atlanta suburb. The job required a criminal background check as part of the job application. It was Wright who went to the Police Station in Lawrenceville, Georgia, to have the Background Check carried out! When he came back the next day to collect the paperwork he was arrested on a warrant issued in Missouri in 1985 for second-degree murder committed way back in 1976!
If only someone in the last 24 years had been suspicious enough of Wright to have carried out a Background Check on him, just like Liza Campbell did with Garrido. Perhaps Background Checks should form part of every job application?
person finder usa , finding people usa and person find usa
Monday, 30 November 2009
Saturday, 28 November 2009
Jaycee Lee Dugard: garden and yard of serious sex offender left unchecked for 18years!-
I’ve noticed in the media this morning that Antioch has an unusually high number of registered SO. Every reason for the local authorities to have a system in place so that society as a whole and young girls in particular have a duty of care and protection afforded them that protects them. Phillip Garrido was regularly visited by his parole officer but even after all the reports by neighbors made to police Garrido’s backyard was never searched. It’s unbelievable. With such a high portion of registered sex offenders in the locality you would think the authorities would prioritise the need for an efficient system of supervision.
How on earth was Jaycee and her children not discovered for all that time?. Regular visits by the parole services to the residence of Garrido never discovered Jaycee and her children held captive in the yard. This man should have had no right of privacy what so ever. If this is the reason given by the parole service as to why no examination was carried out. They haven’t put this forward yet. But I can hear it being muted in the background already!
The whole thing is shocking!
It’s reported in the media comments about how underfunded, undermanned and overworked the various departments are that have been involved in this case for the last eighteen years. The FBI, the Sherif’s dept and the Parole Services. And pray tell me the connection between being undermanned and with an officer from the parole office or the police investigating the yard? The failure to check his garden and backyard when neighbors have reported hearing children’s voices in the backyard, that people were living in the backyard, has absolutely nothing to do with man hours, workload, underfunding or anything else that may be put forward as a reason why this appalling situation went undetected by the authorities for 18years.
I’m feeling utterly frustrated and confused by all of this. Those poor poor girls should never have had to endure those years of captivity. There was just no need.
What do you think?
person finder usa , finding people usa and person find usa
How on earth was Jaycee and her children not discovered for all that time?. Regular visits by the parole services to the residence of Garrido never discovered Jaycee and her children held captive in the yard. This man should have had no right of privacy what so ever. If this is the reason given by the parole service as to why no examination was carried out. They haven’t put this forward yet. But I can hear it being muted in the background already!
The whole thing is shocking!
It’s reported in the media comments about how underfunded, undermanned and overworked the various departments are that have been involved in this case for the last eighteen years. The FBI, the Sherif’s dept and the Parole Services. And pray tell me the connection between being undermanned and with an officer from the parole office or the police investigating the yard? The failure to check his garden and backyard when neighbors have reported hearing children’s voices in the backyard, that people were living in the backyard, has absolutely nothing to do with man hours, workload, underfunding or anything else that may be put forward as a reason why this appalling situation went undetected by the authorities for 18years.
I’m feeling utterly frustrated and confused by all of this. Those poor poor girls should never have had to endure those years of captivity. There was just no need.
What do you think?
person finder usa , finding people usa and person find usa
Friday, 6 November 2009
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Penitentiary Marriages
What were we thinking? Why did we ever allow these two sexual deviants to meet and marry? We allowed Phillip Garrido to court and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, we didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We put them together and then let them get married! How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to ensnare a mentally frail, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a man and woman is present we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that if a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This is how we absolve the woman of any responsibility for the child sexual abuse. We resist the possibility that women can be voluntarily involved with the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to confront the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido compel Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Even after the trial we cannot be certain that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst calling on her incarcerated uncle at Leavenworth Penitentiary Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities doing when they authorized this marriage to go ahead, despite the fact Phillip Garrido wasn’t discharged for another seven years?
Let us be clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These controversial issues need answers but in the meantime we need to remember we let these two degenerates meet, bond and marry whilst he was under our charge in prison.
Check out people search software , people search white pages and hotmail people search at email people search
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, we didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We put them together and then let them get married! How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to ensnare a mentally frail, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a man and woman is present we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that if a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This is how we absolve the woman of any responsibility for the child sexual abuse. We resist the possibility that women can be voluntarily involved with the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to confront the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido compel Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Even after the trial we cannot be certain that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst calling on her incarcerated uncle at Leavenworth Penitentiary Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities doing when they authorized this marriage to go ahead, despite the fact Phillip Garrido wasn’t discharged for another seven years?
Let us be clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These controversial issues need answers but in the meantime we need to remember we let these two degenerates meet, bond and marry whilst he was under our charge in prison.
Check out people search software , people search white pages and hotmail people search at email people search
Did you know that it was us who allowed Nancy and Phillip Garrido to meet and marry in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas whilst he was serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
So even though we knew him to be a known ‘sexual deviant’, in prison to protect society from him, society didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We put them together and then let them get married! Can you believe what you are reading?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Are we converting our penitentiaries into a criminal dating service? A club house between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable women? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a couple is present we assume the woman is coerced. We cannot accept that if a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This way we don’t have to consider that the woman is the evildoer or an eager participant. We are not yet equipped to even think that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This begs the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy coerced or acted willingly?
Even after the trial we cannot guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be let out from prison
Let me repeat my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is a subject that needs much debate but meanwhile what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out person background check , people search email address and aol people search at people background checks
So even though we knew him to be a known ‘sexual deviant’, in prison to protect society from him, society didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We put them together and then let them get married! Can you believe what you are reading?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Are we converting our penitentiaries into a criminal dating service? A club house between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable women? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a couple is present we assume the woman is coerced. We cannot accept that if a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This way we don’t have to consider that the woman is the evildoer or an eager participant. We are not yet equipped to even think that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This begs the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy coerced or acted willingly?
Even after the trial we cannot guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be let out from prison
Let me repeat my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is a subject that needs much debate but meanwhile what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out person background check , people search email address and aol people search at people background checks
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Nancy And Phillip Garrido Tied The Knot Whilst He Was In Leavenworth Prison! We Paid The Bill
Do you appreciate that Nancy Garrido actually met and married Phillip Garrido whilst he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
That didn’t keep the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Are we converting our penitentiaries into a criminal dating service? A home between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable women? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido there is an assumption by society that Nancy is mentally frail and was coerced by Phillip.This allows us to absolve the woman of any responsibility towards the child sexual abuse. People are not yet ready to even consider that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This solicits the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido pressure Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
We may eventually find out the truth when these deviants come to trial but that still doesn’t deal with the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst visiting her incarcerated uncle at the same prison Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be released from prison
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we permitted our penitentiaries be meeting places for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out government people search , msn people search and people search age at people search info
That didn’t keep the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Are we converting our penitentiaries into a criminal dating service? A home between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable women? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido there is an assumption by society that Nancy is mentally frail and was coerced by Phillip.This allows us to absolve the woman of any responsibility towards the child sexual abuse. People are not yet ready to even consider that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This solicits the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido pressure Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
We may eventually find out the truth when these deviants come to trial but that still doesn’t deal with the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst visiting her incarcerated uncle at the same prison Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be released from prison
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we permitted our penitentiaries be meeting places for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out government people search , msn people search and people search age at people search info
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Nancy and Phillip Garrido Got Married In Prison
Why did we ever allow these two degenerates to meet and marry? We permitted Phillip Garrido to charm and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and rape. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
Yet we let Nancy not only to meet him in prison but allowed them enough time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still in prison! Are we stupid or what? Astounding!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to lure a feeble, vulnerable Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy definitely was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved society assume the woman acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.Thereby taking away any responsibility she has for the sexual abuse of the child. Society is not yet equipped to even think that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This invokes the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido pressure Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Even after the trial there is no guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t deal with the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido was introduced to Nancy Bocanegra, who was visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be freed from prison
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our penitentiaries be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out find a persons address , person background checks , meta people search and e mail people search
Yet we let Nancy not only to meet him in prison but allowed them enough time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still in prison! Are we stupid or what? Astounding!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to lure a feeble, vulnerable Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy definitely was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved society assume the woman acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.Thereby taking away any responsibility she has for the sexual abuse of the child. Society is not yet equipped to even think that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This invokes the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido pressure Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Even after the trial there is no guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t deal with the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido was introduced to Nancy Bocanegra, who was visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be freed from prison
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our penitentiaries be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out find a persons address , person background checks , meta people search and e mail people search
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Nancy And Phillip Garrido Tied The Knot Whilst He Was In Leavenworth Prison! Guess Who Paid The Bill?
What were we thinking? Why did we ever allow these two deviants to meet and marry? We allowed Phillip Garrido to cultivate a relationship and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, in prison to protect society from him, society didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We set it up so they could be together and then let them get married! How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we place a mentally weak and insecure woman under the power and command of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant”? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido we all assume that Nancy is mentally frail and was coerced by Phillip.This is how we absolve the female of any responsibility towards the child sexual abuse. We push away the idea that women can be voluntarily participate in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Would you consider that Nancy is a female pedophile? So we ask the question was she pressured or a willing partner?
We may eventually find out the truth when these sexual predators come to trial but that still doesn’t address the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was detained in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage occurred in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not discharged until 1988. Seven years later. What about conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be crystal clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we permitted our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out How to search for people , person finder usa , finding people usa and person find usa at find people usa
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, in prison to protect society from him, society didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We set it up so they could be together and then let them get married! How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we place a mentally weak and insecure woman under the power and command of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant”? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido we all assume that Nancy is mentally frail and was coerced by Phillip.This is how we absolve the female of any responsibility towards the child sexual abuse. We push away the idea that women can be voluntarily participate in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Would you consider that Nancy is a female pedophile? So we ask the question was she pressured or a willing partner?
We may eventually find out the truth when these sexual predators come to trial but that still doesn’t address the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was detained in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage occurred in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not discharged until 1988. Seven years later. What about conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be crystal clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we permitted our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out How to search for people , person finder usa , finding people usa and person find usa at find people usa
Tuesday, 3 November 2009
Jaycee Lee Dugard: We Paid The Bill For Nancy And Phillip Garrido’s Penitentiary Marriage
Why did we ever allow these two degenerates to meet and marry? We gave permission for Phillip Garrido to court and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for abduction and violent sexual assault. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
That didn’t keep the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still incarcerated in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to lure a weak, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy we know was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved we assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This is how we take away any responsibility Nancy has for the sexual abuse of the child. We push away the idea that women can be willingly embroiled in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the classification of a female pedophile? Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one fact we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another inmate, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage took place in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our penitentiaries be meeting places for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out people search by email , state background checks and www people search usa com with reverse phone check review at inteligator review
That didn’t keep the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still incarcerated in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to lure a weak, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy we know was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved we assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This is how we take away any responsibility Nancy has for the sexual abuse of the child. We push away the idea that women can be willingly embroiled in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the classification of a female pedophile? Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one fact we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another inmate, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage took place in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our penitentiaries be meeting places for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out people search by email , state background checks and www people search usa com with reverse phone check review at inteligator review
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Nancy and Phillip Garrido Married In Prison
Did you know that the Prison authorities allowed Nancy and Phillip Garrido to meet and marry in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas whilst he was carrying out a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
That didn’t prevent the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido get together and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth, Kansas. We are our own worst enemy for letting this go on!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reconsidered!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entice a feeble, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy definitely was not acting alone but as soon as a man is present people assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.Thereby taking away any responsibility the woman has for the abuse of the child. We revolt against the thought that women can be willingly engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to consider the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
We may eventually find out the truth when they come to trial but that still doesn’t address the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another inmate, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage was in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not released until 1988. Seven years later. Did they get conjugal rights for those seven years?
So the question remains. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out people search by address , people search by number and search people by number at people serch
That didn’t prevent the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido get together and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth, Kansas. We are our own worst enemy for letting this go on!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reconsidered!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entice a feeble, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy definitely was not acting alone but as soon as a man is present people assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.Thereby taking away any responsibility the woman has for the abuse of the child. We revolt against the thought that women can be willingly engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to consider the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
We may eventually find out the truth when they come to trial but that still doesn’t address the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another inmate, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage was in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not released until 1988. Seven years later. Did they get conjugal rights for those seven years?
So the question remains. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out people search by address , people search by number and search people by number at people serch
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Prison Inmate Marriages
Do you realize that Nancy Garrido was introduced to and married Phillip Garrido whilst he was in Leavenworth Prison in Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for abduction and violent sexual assault?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
That didn’t prevent the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido see each other and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Are we changing our penitentiaries into a criminal dating service? A club house between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable females? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a man and woman is present we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This is how we absolve the woman of any responsibility towards the child sexual abuse. We push away the possibility that women can be voluntarily involved with the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to answer the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido force Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one fact we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was paying a visit to another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be discharged from prison
So the question still is. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is an issue that needs much debate but in the meantime what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out fbi criminal background check , people background checks and criminal background searches at employment criminal background check
That didn’t prevent the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido see each other and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Are we changing our penitentiaries into a criminal dating service? A club house between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable females? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a man and woman is present we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This is how we absolve the woman of any responsibility towards the child sexual abuse. We push away the possibility that women can be voluntarily involved with the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to answer the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido force Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one fact we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was paying a visit to another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip Garrido would be discharged from prison
So the question still is. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is an issue that needs much debate but in the meantime what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out fbi criminal background check , people background checks and criminal background searches at employment criminal background check
Monday, 2 November 2009
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Nancy And Phillip Garrido Tied The Knot Whilst He Was In Leavenworth Prison! Guess Who Paid The Bill?
How could we ever allow these two degenerates to meet and marry? We allowed Phillip Garrido to woo and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
Despite this we let Nancy not only to meet Phillip Garrido in prison but provided them enough time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still in prison! How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we place a mentally weak and fragile woman under the power and mastery of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant”? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy we know was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved we assume the woman acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This way we don’t have to acknowledge that the woman is the miscreant or an eager participant. Society just can’t acknowledge that the woman is an enthusiastic participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This raises the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
Even after the trial we cannot be certain that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst calling on her incarcerated uncle at the same prison Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage took place in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Did they get conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be frank about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These matters of contention need answers but in the meantime we need to remember we let these two degenerates meet, bond and marry whilst Phillip Garrido was under our custody in prison.
Check out dating background check , government background check and person background check at nanny background checks
Despite this we let Nancy not only to meet Phillip Garrido in prison but provided them enough time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still in prison! How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we place a mentally weak and fragile woman under the power and mastery of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant”? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy we know was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved we assume the woman acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This way we don’t have to acknowledge that the woman is the miscreant or an eager participant. Society just can’t acknowledge that the woman is an enthusiastic participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This raises the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
Even after the trial we cannot be certain that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst calling on her incarcerated uncle at the same prison Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage took place in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Did they get conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be frank about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These matters of contention need answers but in the meantime we need to remember we let these two degenerates meet, bond and marry whilst Phillip Garrido was under our custody in prison.
Check out dating background check , government background check and person background check at nanny background checks
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Penitentiary Marriages
Did you grasp that it was us who allowed Nancy and Phillip Garrido to meet and marry in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas whilst he was carrying out a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
So even though he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, the authorities didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We set it up so they could be together and then let them get married! Can you believe what you are reading?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entrap a feeble, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido we automatically take for granted that Nancy is weak minded and was coerced by Phillip.This is how we take away any responsibility she has for the sexual abuse of the child. Society just can’t countenance that the woman is an enthusiastic participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Would you be of the opinion that Nancy is a female pedophile? So we ask the question was she coerced or an eager partner?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one important issue we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities thinking when they allowed this marriage to go ahead, despite the fact Phillip Garrido wasn’t let out for another seven years?
Let us be frank about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These controversial issues need answers but meanwhile we need to remember we let these two deviants meet, bond and marry whilst he was under our custody in prison.
Check out background check laws , ncic check and background check law at doctor background check
So even though he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, the authorities didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We set it up so they could be together and then let them get married! Can you believe what you are reading?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entrap a feeble, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s final taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido we automatically take for granted that Nancy is weak minded and was coerced by Phillip.This is how we take away any responsibility she has for the sexual abuse of the child. Society just can’t countenance that the woman is an enthusiastic participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Would you be of the opinion that Nancy is a female pedophile? So we ask the question was she coerced or an eager partner?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one important issue we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities thinking when they allowed this marriage to go ahead, despite the fact Phillip Garrido wasn’t let out for another seven years?
Let us be frank about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These controversial issues need answers but meanwhile we need to remember we let these two deviants meet, bond and marry whilst he was under our custody in prison.
Check out background check laws , ncic check and background check law at doctor background check
Jaycee Lee Dugard: We Married Nancy and Phillip Garrido in Leavenworth Penitentary! Who Paid The Price?
Do you know that Nancy Garrido was introduced to and married Phillip Garrido whilst he was in Leavenworth Prison in Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
In spite of this we let Nancy not only to meet him in prison but gave them sufficient time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still incarcerated! We are our own worst enemy for letting this go on!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to enmesh a mentally frail, vulnerable Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a couple is involved we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This is how we absolve the female of any responsibility to the child sexual abuse. We resist the idea that women can be willingly engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to answer the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido compel Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Even after the trial we cannot guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was caged in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip would be let out from prison
Let us be crystal clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is an issue that needs a lot of reflection but in the meantime what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out crimal background checks , government background checks and employment criminal background checks at criminal record background checks
In spite of this we let Nancy not only to meet him in prison but gave them sufficient time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still incarcerated! We are our own worst enemy for letting this go on!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to enmesh a mentally frail, vulnerable Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a couple is involved we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This is how we absolve the female of any responsibility to the child sexual abuse. We resist the idea that women can be willingly engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to answer the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido compel Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Even after the trial we cannot guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t address the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was caged in prison Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip would be let out from prison
Let us be crystal clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is an issue that needs a lot of reflection but in the meantime what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out crimal background checks , government background checks and employment criminal background checks at criminal record background checks
Jaycee Lee Dugard: We Helped Marry Nancy and Phillip Garrido in Leavenworth Penitentary! Who Paid The Price?
Do you appreciate that Nancy Garrido was introduced to and married Phillip Garrido whilst he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and rape?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
That didn’t keep the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still incarcerated in Leavenworth, Kansas. What were we thinking?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entice a feeble, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido we all assume that Nancy is feebly minded and was coerced by Phillip.This allows us to absolve the woman of any responsibility to the child sexual abuse. People are not yet able to even consider that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to face the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” The next question is was she forced or an eager partner?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one particular point we cannot hide from. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido met Nancy Bocanegra, who was visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage occurred in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not discharged until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
So the question persists. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out cheap background check , internet background check and employee criminal background check at company background checks
That didn’t keep the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still incarcerated in Leavenworth, Kansas. What were we thinking?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entice a feeble, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido we all assume that Nancy is feebly minded and was coerced by Phillip.This allows us to absolve the woman of any responsibility to the child sexual abuse. People are not yet able to even consider that women can willingly abuse children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
We have to face the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” The next question is was she forced or an eager partner?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one particular point we cannot hide from. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido met Nancy Bocanegra, who was visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage occurred in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not discharged until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
So the question persists. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out cheap background check , internet background check and employee criminal background check at company background checks
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Penitentiary Marriages
Do you appreciate that Nancy Garrido actually met and married Phillip Garrido whilst he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and violent sexual assault?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
That didn’t stop the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido see each other and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. What were we thinking?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Are we changing our prisons into a criminal dating service? A home between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable women? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido there is an assumption by society that Nancy is mentally frail and was coerced by Phillip.Thereby taking away any responsibility the woman has for the sexual abuse of the child. We resist the thought that women can be willingly engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This asks the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy forced or acted willingly?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one fact we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in Leavenworth Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities doing when they approved of this marriage to go ahead, even though Phillip Garrido wasn’t freed for another seven years?
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out crimal background check , criminal record background search and online criminal background checks at cheap background checks
That didn’t stop the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido see each other and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. What were we thinking?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Are we changing our prisons into a criminal dating service? A home between dominant male sexual deviants and mentally weak, vulnerable women? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. With Nancy and Phillip Garrido there is an assumption by society that Nancy is mentally frail and was coerced by Phillip.Thereby taking away any responsibility the woman has for the sexual abuse of the child. We resist the thought that women can be willingly engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This asks the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Was Nancy forced or acted willingly?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one fact we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in Leavenworth Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities doing when they approved of this marriage to go ahead, even though Phillip Garrido wasn’t freed for another seven years?
Let me renew my question. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we allowed our prisons be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out crimal background check , criminal record background search and online criminal background checks at cheap background checks
Sunday, 1 November 2009
Preview of Your Article
How could we ever allow these two perverts to meet and marry? We gave permission for Phillip Garrido to cultivate a relationship and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and rape. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, we didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We gave them the opportunity to be together and then let them get married! I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entice a mentally frail, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a man and woman is present we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This way we don’t have to consider that the woman is the transgressor or an eager participant. We push away the idea that women can be voluntarily engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This invokes the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido compel Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one important issue we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was paying a visit to another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities doing when they allowed this marriage to go ahead, despite the fact Phillip Garrido wasn’t discharged for another seven years?
So the question stays the same. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is a subject that needs discussing but for now what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out people search software , people search white pages and hotmail people search at email people search
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, we didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We gave them the opportunity to be together and then let them get married! I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reviewed!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to entice a mentally frail, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Maybe one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a man and woman is present we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This way we don’t have to consider that the woman is the transgressor or an eager participant. We push away the idea that women can be voluntarily engage in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This invokes the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido compel Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one important issue we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido first saw Nancy Bocanegra, who was paying a visit to another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. What were the Prison authorities doing when they allowed this marriage to go ahead, despite the fact Phillip Garrido wasn’t discharged for another seven years?
So the question stays the same. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is a subject that needs discussing but for now what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out people search software , people search white pages and hotmail people search at email people search
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Nancy and Phillip Garrido Married In Prison
What were we thinking? Why did we ever allow these two deviants to meet and marry? We permitted Phillip Garrido to court and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and rape. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
That didn’t stop the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to lure a weak, vulnerable Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy definitely was not acting alone but as soon as a man is present people assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This is how we take away any responsibility the woman has for the abuse of the child. We revolt against the thought that women can be willingly participate in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This begs the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido force Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one important issue we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in Leavenworth Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another degenerate, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage occurred in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
So the question persists. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is an issue that needs discussing but for now what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out person background check , people search email address and aol people search at people background checks
That didn’t stop the Prison authorities from letting Nancy and Phillip Garrido meet and eventually marry whilst he was still imprisoned in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas. How could we let this happen!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to lure a weak, vulnerable Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy definitely was not acting alone but as soon as a man is present people assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This is how we take away any responsibility the woman has for the abuse of the child. We revolt against the thought that women can be willingly participate in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
This begs the question, “Is Nancy a female pedophile?” Did Phillip Garrido force Nancy to be involved or was she willing?
Wherever the truth of this lies there is one important issue we cannot dismiss. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
While he was locked up in Leavenworth Phillip Garrido met Nancy. She was there visiting another degenerate, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage occurred in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
So the question persists. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. This is an issue that needs discussing but for now what were we doing letting them get married in the first place?
Check out person background check , people search email address and aol people search at people background checks
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Nancy and Phillip Garrido Married In Prison
How could we ever allow these two deviants to meet and marry? We gave permission for Phillip Garrido to cultivate a relationship and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and rape. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
In spite of this we let Nancy not only to meet him in prison but allowed them enough time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still in prison! What were we thinking?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we place a weak and insecure woman under the influence and mastery of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant”? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy certainly was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved people assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This way we don’t have to consider that the woman is the transgressor or a willing participant. Society is unwilling to accept that the woman is an eager participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the classification of a female pedophile? The next question is was Nancy pressured or a willing partner?
Even after the trial there is no guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t deal with the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido was introduced to Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip would be discharged from prison
Let us be clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we let our penitentiaries be a dating agency for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out government people search , msn people search and people search age at people search info
In spite of this we let Nancy not only to meet him in prison but allowed them enough time together to form a relationship, get engaged and eventually marry whilst he was still in prison! What were we thinking?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be re-examined!
Did we place a weak and insecure woman under the influence and mastery of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant”? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Possibly one of society’s ultimate taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy certainly was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved people assume the female acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.This way we don’t have to consider that the woman is the transgressor or a willing participant. Society is unwilling to accept that the woman is an eager participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the classification of a female pedophile? The next question is was Nancy pressured or a willing partner?
Even after the trial there is no guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t deal with the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At the same prison, Garrido was introduced to Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. Seven years before Phillip would be discharged from prison
Let us be clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we let our penitentiaries be a dating agency for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out government people search , msn people search and people search age at people search info
Jaycee Lee Dugard: We Helped Marry Nancy and Phillip Garrido in Leavenworth Penitentary! Who Paid The Price?
How could we ever allow these two sexual deviants to meet and marry? We gave permission for Phillip Garrido to cultivate a relationship and marry Nancy Garrido when he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary, Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and rape. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, in prison to protect society from him, the authorities didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We gave them the opportunity to be together and then let them get married! Can you believe what you are reading?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reconsidered!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to enmesh a weak, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy we know was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved society assume the woman acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.Thereby taking away any responsibility the woman has for the sexual abuse of the child. Society just can’t accept that the woman is a willing participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the category of a female pedophile? Was she coerced or acted willingly?
We may eventually find out the truth when these deviants come to trial but that still doesn’t deal with the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido was introduced to Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage was in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not let out until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be crystal clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we permitted our penitentiaries be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out find a persons address , person background checks , meta people search and e mail people search
So even though the Prison authorities knew he was a known ‘sexual deviant’, in prison to protect society from him, the authorities didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We gave them the opportunity to be together and then let them get married! Can you believe what you are reading?
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reconsidered!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to enmesh a weak, defenseless Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. Nancy we know was not acting alone but as soon as a man is involved society assume the woman acted under duress, fear or is coerced by the man.Thereby taking away any responsibility the woman has for the sexual abuse of the child. Society just can’t accept that the woman is a willing participant.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the category of a female pedophile? Was she coerced or acted willingly?
We may eventually find out the truth when these deviants come to trial but that still doesn’t deal with the single potent fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
At Leavenworth, Garrido was introduced to Nancy Bocanegra, who was calling on another prisoner, her uncle. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage was in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not let out until 1988. Seven years later. Were they given conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be crystal clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. Have we permitted our penitentiaries be a contact club for sexual deviants? Not only that we then marry them!
Check out find a persons address , person background checks , meta people search and e mail people search
Jaycee Lee Dugard: Penitentiary Marriages
Do you realize that Nancy Garrido was introduced to and married Phillip Garrido whilst he was in Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas serving a 50-year federal sentence for kidnap and rape?. She was 26 and he was 30. His psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser”.
So even though we knew him to be a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, society didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We put them together and then let them get married! I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reconsidered!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to ensnare a weak, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a couple is involved we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This allows us to absolve the female of any responsibility for the child sexual abuse. We revolt against the idea that women can be willingly embroiled in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the title of a female pedophile? Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
Even after the trial we cannot guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t disguise the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst calling on her incarcerated uncle at Leavenworth Penitentiary Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage took place in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Did they get conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These controversial issues need answers but for now we need to remember we let these two degenerates meet, bond and marry whilst he was under our charge in prison.
Check out How to search for people , person finder usa , finding people usa and person find usa at find people usa
So even though we knew him to be a known ‘sexual deviant’, locked away to protect society from him, society didn’t protect Nancy either from him or herself. We put them together and then let them get married! I'm shocked! This is unbelievable!
The issue of Prison Marriages needs to be reconsidered!
Did we allow a sexual deviant, Phillip Garrido, to ensnare a weak, unprotected Nancy? Or was Nancy a willing female pedophile?
Perhaps one of society’s last taboos is the concept of ‘female pedophiles acting alone’. When a couple is involved we assume the woman is coerced. Society cannot accept that when a man is present that the woman is a willing participant.This allows us to absolve the female of any responsibility for the child sexual abuse. We revolt against the idea that women can be willingly embroiled in the sexual abuse of children.
Female sexual abuse is much more threatening to the fabric of our society- it undermines our core beliefs and feelings about how women should relate to children.
Should Nancy Garrido fall into the title of a female pedophile? Was Nancy intimidated or acted willingly?
Even after the trial we cannot guarantee that the truth will out but that still doesn’t disguise the fact. We paid for the wedding!
Garrido was convicted of kidnap and rape and began serving a 50-year federal sentence on June 30, 1977, at Leavenworth Penitentiary in Kansas. In a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation, Garrido was diagnosed as a "sexual deviant and chronic drug abuser."
Whilst calling on her incarcerated uncle at Leavenworth Penitentiary Nancy met Phillip Garrido. On October 5, 1981, Phillip Garrido and Nancy Bocanegra were married at Leavenworth. So the marriage took place in 1981 even though Phillip Garrido was not freed until 1988. Seven years later. Did they get conjugal rights for those seven years?
Let us be clear about this. Did we place a weak and vulnerable woman under the power and control of a diagnosed incarcerated “sexual deviant” or are women pedophiles much more responsible for their abuse of children than society wishes to admit?
Prison Marriages. These controversial issues need answers but for now we need to remember we let these two degenerates meet, bond and marry whilst he was under our charge in prison.
Check out How to search for people , person finder usa , finding people usa and person find usa at find people usa
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)